检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《海洋与湖沼》1995年第2期215-222,共8页Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金!3870079;中国科学院海洋研究所开放实验室资助!923007
摘 要:李春生先生在“MarineSciences”1992年第4卷第3期第212-219页上发表题为“HairtailfishesfromChineseCoastalWaters(Trichiuridae)”(《中国近海带鱼类》)一文(以下简称该文),把中国近海带鱼分成3个种并定名两个新种。本文作者对该文进行比较和分析,认为该文从基本概念到原始数据的测量、计算和资料的分析整理等方面,存在系列的错误,某些形态描述与事实不符。故此,依照该文的论据,两个新种不能成立。In August 1992, Mr. Li Chunsheng's paper-"Hairtail fishes from Chinese coastal waters (Trichi ridae)" was published in "Marine Sciences" (English Edition,Vol. 4, No.3, pp. 212-219). In this paper, Mr. Li divided Chinese Trichiurus into three species: Trichiurus minor n. sp., T. margarites n. sp. and T. japonicus.At the Meeting of Chinese Society of Ichthyology in October 1991, the authors of this paper reported that the hairtail fishes from Chinese coastal waters should be divided into three species according to analyses of 1400 hairtail fish samples from 10 spawning sea areas by the methods of morphology and biochemistry. In March 1992, a research note- "Studies on the genetic variation and systemati s of the hairtail fislies from the South China Sea" was published in "Marine Sciences" 1992 (2), PP. 69-72, in which two new species were named Trichiurus brcvis Wang et You sp. nov., T. nanhaiensis Wang et Xu sp. nov., and another hairtail fish T. Hau mela (Forskal) was reported. The morphology of these three hairtail fishes (suchas the form of the skull, and relevant ratios were obvious and distinctly different).The results of study on the biochemical data are the same with those of the morphology. Eleven isozymes were analysed by starch-gel and polyacrylamide-gel electr ophoresis and 24 loci were recorded. There were specificity of species in 9 loci of 4 isozymes. The genetic distances between each two species ranged from 0.2230-0.3822. The full paper of classification of the species of Chinese Trichiurus was published in "Acta oceanologica Sinica" in March, 1993 (Vol. 15 No.2 pp 77-83).The authors of this paper think Li's three species are similar to authors' of this papers, and that: 1. More than one third of the data presented by Li were inaccurate or incorrect. 2. Almost all data used in Li's paper were average valusi and they were intersected from 29 to 100 percent. These data cannot adequately identify species. 3.More than two thirds of the relevant identification items were insignificant or meaningless. 4.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49