检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:展爱华[1]
出 处:《实用全科医学》2005年第5期415-416,共2页Applied Journal Of General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜子宫切除的可行性。方法回顾性分析比较腹腔镜子宫切除99例和传统子宫切除46例的临床资料。结果两组术前情况及手术时间无显著差异(P>0.05),而术中出血,术后病率及术后恢复等差异有极显著性(P<0.01)。结论腹腔镜子宫切除术具有安全、微创、出血少、疼痛轻、康复快等优点,故腹腔镜子宫切除术是安全可行的。Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Methods The clinical data of 99 cases treated by LH (laparoscopic group) and 46 cases treated by conventional hysterectomy (conventional group) were analyzed retrospactively. Results The patients' preoperative condition and average duration of operation in two groups were no significantly(P 〉0.05). But the blood loss, the postoperative morbidity rate and recovery time in laparoscopic group were significantly less than those of conventional group (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions LH has many advantages, i.e. micro- incision,less blood loss, less pain, quick recovered and fewest complications. So LH is feasibel and safe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28