《韵学集成》与《直音篇》比较  

Comparison of Yun xue ji cheng (《韵学集成》) Zhi yin pian (直音篇)

作　　者：王进安[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学文学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第4期86-89,共4页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：《韵学集成》和《直音篇》为明代章黼所撰,均成书于明“天顺庚辰”(即1460)年,后者取名为《直音篇》,易让人误认为它是《韵学集成》所有韵字的“直音篇”。本文从二书的编排体例、收字和注音等方面进行比较,认为《直音篇》具有注音并非都是“直音”、以部首为序编排、许多韵字的反切与《韵学集成》不同等特点。同时,认为二书虽然存在着诸多不同,但当属同一音系,是侧重点有所不同的姊妹篇,二者相辅相成,形成一个完整的韵书体系。Yun xueji cheng and Zhiyin plan are all written by Zhang Fu , which were finished in Tian Shun Geng Chen （天顺庚辰） （1460） year of Ming Dynasty . The second book named Zhi yin pian, is apt to lead misunderstanding that it is Zhi- yin （直音） of Yun xue ji cheng. After contrasting the style, charge words and phonetic notation between two books, this paper summarizes the following characteristis of Zhi yin pian ： Firstly, its phonetic notation isn＇t all the Zhi yin of gun xueji chen. Second, it put the characters in the order of radicals. Thirdly, the “fan qie” （反切） of many characters with are different between two books. Even though there are a lot of differences in these two books, we still hold that the sound system of the two books are identical, which emphasizes different aspect and complement each other to be an intact rhyme-book-system.

关 键 词：《韵学集成》 《直音篇》 音系特点 体例比较 

分 类 号：H113.6[语言文字—汉语]