检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋春华[1] 东贵荣[2] 杨素清[3] 马林[4] 刘瑛琦[1] 徐悦泽[4] 朱文增[1] 鲍春龄[2] 赵桂君[3]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院,哈尔滨150040 [2]黑龙江中医药大学 [3]黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院 [4]黑龙江中医研究院
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2005年第8期17-18,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:国家中医药管理局<中华人民共和国穴典>项目(国中医药科03XDLZ21)
摘 要:目的观察针刺治疗慢性荨麻疹的疗效。方法将96例慢性荨麻疹患者随机分为治疗组47和对照组49例,治疗组采用针刺双侧曲池穴,对照组口服西替利嗪,比较两组疗效及风团数量、大小,瘙痒程度及发作次数。结果与结论两组治疗前后患者风团数量、风团大小、瘙痒程度、每星期发作次数组内比较有显著差异(P<0.01),治疗组患者上述各指标改善均优于对照组(P<0.01);两组疗效有显著差异(P<0.01),表明治疗组疗效优于对照组。Objective To investigate the curative effect of acupuncture on chronic urticaria, Method Ninety-six patients with chronic urticaria were randomly divided into a treatment group of 47 cases and a control group of 49 cases. The treatment group was treated by needling bilateral points Quchi ( LI 11 ) and the control group, by oral administration of cetrizet. The curative effect, the amount and size of wheals, the degree of itching and the number of attacks were compared between the two groups. Results and Conclusion There were significant differences in the amount and size of wheals, the degree of itching and the number of attacks between pretreatment and posttreatment in the two groups of patients (P 〈 0.01 ). The above indices were better in the treatment group than in the control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). There was a significant difference in curative effect between the two groups( P 〈 0.01 ). It is showed that the curative effect was better in the treatment group than in the control group.
分 类 号:R246.7[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28