2种头孢唑啉钠皮试法的临床效果观察与分析  

Observation and analysis on clinical effect of two kind of skin test method with cefaiolin sodium

作　　者：杨相梅[1] 郑建平[1] 丁敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院肺科,重庆400016

出　　处：《重庆医科大学学报》2005年第4期631-632,共2页Journal of Chongqing Medical University

摘　　要：目的:评价华康牌Ⅱ型(广州伟杰华科技发展有限公司生产)快速过敏皮试仪做头孢唑啉钠皮试的准确性。方法:在同一个病人身上使用同一批号的头孢唑啉钠,同时作传统的皮试和皮试仪皮试,以比较2种皮试法的结果差异。结果:267例患者中2种皮试方法均阳性者1例,2种方法均阴性者263例,传统皮试法假阳性、皮试仪皮试法阴性者3例,传统皮试法阴性、皮试仪皮试法阳性者0例。结论:华康牌Ⅱ型快速过敏皮试仪对头孢唑啉皮试准确、无痛、省时、高效。Ohjeetive：To evaluate the accuracy of YLM-Ⅱ quick Cefazolin Sodium Skin Tester（Made in Guangzhou WeiJeiHua Tech. Develop Co. , Ltd. ） Methods ： Use same batch number of Cefazolin Sodium on a person, at the same time do traditional skin test on the same person to compare the difference of the two methods. Results：Among the result of skin test on 267 patients, 1 patient is positive in both methods,263 patients are negetive in both, 3 patients got false positive in traditional skin test but negetive in trail means,none got negative in the traditional skin test while positive in trail means. Conclusion：Comparing the traditional skin test method with YLM-Ⅱ skin-test apparatus,the latter is more accurate,painless,time-saver and efficient.

关 键 词：皮试法 头孢哗啉钠 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学]