检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何键铭[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省茂名市人民医院,广东茂名市525000
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2005年第7期575-575,共1页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的评价运动疗法对神经根型颈椎病的疗效。方法50例患者随机分为治疗组30例(牵引加运动疗法治疗),对照组20例(单纯颈椎牵引治疗),进行疗效比较。结果治疗组痊愈12例,显效11例,有效8例,无效1例;对照组痊愈6例,显效5例,有效4例,无效无效5例(P<0.05)。结论牵引与运动疗法联合应用可能取得更佳疗效。Objective To observe the effect of traction combined with exercise on the cervical vertebra disease of the nerve root type. Methods 50 cases were divided in treating group and control. The cases in treating group (30 cases) were treated with cervical vertebra traction and exercise, and those in control group were treated with cervical vertebra traction only. Results In treating group, 12 cases were cured,11 were very effective, 8 were effective, 1 was ineffective, while those in control, 6 cases were cured, 5 were very effective, 4 were effective, 5 were ineffective(P〈0.05). Conclusion Combined exercise with traction is more effective than traction alone on cervical vertebra disease of the nerve root type.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145