波普尔的批判理性主义的“事实”与“价值”二元论  

Dualism of “Fact” and “Value” in Karl Popper’s Critical Reason

作　　者：张云鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学哲学社会学院

出　　处：《学术月刊》2005年第8期64-69,共6页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：波普尔认为,以柏拉图、黑格尔、马克思为代表的历史决定论把“是”与“应当”混在一起,是事实与价值一元论,在理论方法上是错误的。波普尔本人主张事实与价值的二元论,认为无论历史还是外在自然都不能替我们决定什么、选择什么,道德决定不可能从社会事实或对这些事实的描述中推导出来,而是源于我们的自由选择。对“休谟问题”中的“事实”与“应当”,马克思持一元论和二元论的辩证观点,由此坚持了历史决定论中的辩证法。Karl Poppor believes that the historical determinism represented by Plato, Hegel and Marx mixed “is” to “must”, thus is the monism of fact and value, and is wrong in theoretical methodology. Poppor himself holds the dualism of fact and value, and he believes that neither history nor the extrinsic nature could decide and choose for us. Moral decision could not be deducted from social fact or the description to these facts, but originated from our free choice. As for the “fact” and “must” in “the issue of Hume”, Marx holds a dialectical viewpoint of monism and dualism, and thus persists in dialectics in historical determinism.

关 键 词：波善尔 批判理性主义 “事实” “价值” 二元论 历史决定论 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]