检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《管理科学》2005年第4期26-31,共6页Journal of Management Science
摘 要:在西方民主社会中,企业对政治的参与是合法的和合乎伦理的,20世纪70年代以后,西方理论界对企业参与政治的现象进行了大量的研究,并一直被归入公司政治行为这一主题。尽管中国存在大量的公司政治活动,但对其的研究却很缺乏,对中国企业如何影响政府政策制定进行简要的探讨,由于文化、体制等方面的差异,中国企业参与政治的途径与西方存在较大的差异,而且正是由于企业参与途径和方式上存在问题导致了中国的权力腐败等问题。In the western democratic society, firm's participation in political process is legal and accords with the popular ethics. Since 1970s, large number of literature has focused on the phenomenon of firm's participation in politics in western academic field. These studies are gathered under the theme of corporate political action(CPA). Although there are many CPAs in China, study on this topic is still insufficient. This paper discusses how Chinese enterprises influence government policy-making. Due to cultural and systematic differences between China and the west, the approach that Chinese enterprises use to influence politics is different from those of the west's. Problems on such approaches result in the problems such as power corruption in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15