金钱债权执行竞合解决原则的论争与评析  

Arguments and Comments on the Principle of Settlement of Money Obligator y Right by Concurrent Execution

作　　者：王磊[1] 陈立超 

机构地区：[1]新疆社会科学院法学研究所 [2]乌鲁木齐市头屯河区人民法院

出　　处：《新疆社会科学》2005年第4期67-72,共6页Social Sciences in Xinjiang

摘　　要：各国在解决金钱债权的执行竞合问题时,有优先主义、平等主义和折衷主义等立法例。学界对各种原则的优劣论争由来已久,至今仍无定论。我国目前解决金钱债权执行竞合的原则既未采优先主义,也未采平等主义或折衷主义。最高人民法院对此问题作出了相当细化的规定体现了其在相关立法不完备的情况下解决实际问题的良苦用心。由于我国破产立法最终会采用一般破产主义,为与之相协调,我国今后关于金钱债权执行竞合解决原则的立法选择应为优先主义。There are priority doctrine、equal doctrine and compromi se doctrine concerning the legislation about the settlement of money obligatory right by concurrent execution in the world. The controversy over the advantages and shortcomings of these doctrines has been a long-standing issue in the academ ic interests and has not settled down yet. In China, neither priority doctrine n or equal doctrine and compromise doctrine are adopted in the settlement of money obligatory right by concurrent execution. However, the Supreme People's Court m ade quite detailed provisions about this issue, showing its keen intention to so lve the problem on the condition of incomplete legislation on relevant issues. B ecause general bankruptcy will be adopted at last in the bankruptcy law of China , priority doctrine should be chosen in the legislation for the settlement of mo ney obligatory right.

关 键 词：金钱债权 执行竞合 解决原则 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学]