检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李黎军[1] 宋宏羽[1] 潘洁森[1] 程媛[1]
出 处:《中华放射医学与防护杂志》2005年第4期366-367,共2页Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
摘 要:目的探讨一种快捷、准确求光子束不规则射野等效方野的方法。方法不规则射野按对称射束中心与不对称射束中心分为两类,每类再以不规则野的周长与原开野周长的比值R分为:R>1,R=1,R<1三种情况。选择6种不规则射野,实测吸收剂量;分别用A,B,C3种方法计算其等效方野,用等效后方野剂量参数计算处方剂量,与实测剂量比较。结果R>1,B方法准确;R=1,A和C方法较准确,B方法亦符合精度要求;R<1,A,B,C方法一致准确。结论笔者推荐临床使用B方法,便于标准化操作。Objective To explore a rapid method of calculating an equivalent square field for irregular photon beam fields. Methods Irregular photon fields can be divided into two types: the fields symmetric to the beam central axis and the fields dissymmetric to the beam central axis. Each type contains three conditions (i. e. R 〉 1, R = 1, R 〈 1 ) according to the perimeter ratios of the irregular fields to the original fields. To choose 6 irregular fields and measure the absorption doses. Then work out the equivalent square field of each of the 6 irregular fields by means of A, B and C. Finally compare the prescription doses and those measured. Results In the condition R 〉 1, method B worked precisely. In the condition R = 1, method A and method C worked rather precisely, while method B meet the accuracy demand. In the condition R 〉 1, method A, B and C worked precisely and consistently. Conclusion Method B can be recommended for clinical use, for it is convenient for standardized operations and meets the accuracy demand.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.186