点动态学方程几种解法的比较  被引量:7

Comparison of different solutions for point kinetics equations

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:经荥清[1] 李君利[1] 罗经宇[1] 

机构地区:[1]清华大学核能技术设计研究院

出  处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》1995年第3期7-12,共6页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)

基  金:国家"863"高科技项目

摘  要:本文系统介绍了点动态学方程的各种解法及其特点,并对其中影响较大的三种方法Gear法、三阶Hermite插值法以及PpqM法的截断误差和稳定性进行了讨论。最后,本文利用所编制的三种方法的程序对轻水堆和快堆的标准问题进行了校算,结果证明PpqM法可以有效地求解点动态学方程,它所用的计算时间短而且结果也更精确。he various methods for point kinetics equations are introduced systematically inthis paper, with their different features presented. Then three of these methods, includingGear linear multi-step method, three-order Hermite polynomials method and P,, Mpolynomials approximations, which have great influences on other methods and have beenattached great attentions in other papers, are discussed on their truncation errors andstability characters. Finally, benchmark problems for both light water reactors and liquidmetal fast breeder reactors are calculated by programs of these three methods to check thecalculating efficiency of them. The Ppq M method is considered to solve point kineticsequations efficiently, which uses less CPU time, and its calculation results are moreaccurate.

关 键 词:点堆模型 刚性问题 反应堆 点动态学方程 

分 类 号:TL329[核科学技术—核技术及应用]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象