检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞雨生[1] 王慧娟 李勇 肖申[1] 季大玺[1] 黎磊石[1]
机构地区:[1]南京金陵医院解放军肾脏病研究所
出 处:《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》1995年第4期332-333,共2页Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
摘 要:本文测定30例腹透患者的腹膜转运功能.其中高标准转运4例(13.3%),高于平均转运17例(56.7%),低于平均转运8例(26.7%)以及低转运1例(3.3%)。按普通方式透析(2%透析液2000ml1/4h×4次/d),高和低标准转运的患者透析效能明显地低于其它转运类型。这些患者苦根据其腹膜转运类型更改透析方案,则能明显地增加透析效能。he standard peritoneal equilibrationtest(PET) was performed in 30 patients onCAPD. Patients were classfied as low (LO .n = 1 ) . low average ( LA . n = 8 ) . high aver-age (HA, n = 17) . and high (HI. n =4 )transporters based on the dialysate/plasmacreatinine (D/P, Cr) after 4 hour dwells.After 5. 8 ( 1 ~ 48) months on CAPD . the pa-tients PET KT/V urea and creainine cler-ance (CC) were assessed. We found that patients were older in LO and LA groups thanin HI and HA groups (51. 5± 9. 1 : 41. 6±.13. 9yr . P<0. 05 ). The adequacy in HI andLO groups was lower than other groups.After changing dialysate dwell time just accorduig to the PET in 4 patients with HIand patients with LA group,the KT/V ureaand CC were all increased significantly (P<0. 01 ). In conclusion . the peritoneal trans-port ability was much different among individuals ,which correlated to dialysis adequacy strongly. The standard peritoneal dialysiswas not suitable for all patients, whichshould be adJusted according to PET.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158