检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄启华[1] 邱东川[1] 罗雅[1] 谭祺 杨光敏
机构地区:[1]四川省医学科学院寄生虫病防治研究所
出 处:《中国人兽共患病杂志》1989年第1期20-22,共3页Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
摘 要:本文应用包虫囊液多糖抗原对45例包虫病患者血清、77例其它寄生虫病患者血清和106例正常人血清进行ELISA测定,并与囊液热稳定抗原和粗抗原比较。其阳性率多糖抗原为93.33%,热稳定抗原为91.11%,粗抗原为95.55%。正常人血清的假阳性率分别为4.70%、3.77%和7.54%。结果显示3种抗原的敏感性无显著差异,而多糖抗原和热稳定抗原的非特异反应(假阳性率)则有所降低,尤以囊虫病更为明显。Three kinds of antigen preparations (polysaccharide, thermo-stable, and crude antigens) from sheep hydatid cyst fluid were compared for sensitivity and specificity in ELISA for detecting hydatid disease. 45 sera from patients with hydatid disease, 77 sera from other, parasitoses and 106 normal tihuman sera were examined. It was found that to the proved patients, the positive rate of polysaccharide antigen was 93.33%, thermo-stable antigen 91.11% and crude antigen 95.55%, and their false positive rates 4.70%, 3.77%, and 7.54%respectively. The results showed that in sensitivity, there were no significant differences among three antigen preparations, while non-specificity of polysaccharide antigen and thermo-stable antigen was-lower than that of crude antigen in detecting sera df normal individuals and of other parasitoses especially of cysticercosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145