检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学环境科学系
出 处:《应用与环境生物学报》1995年第1期68-73,共6页Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:比较了A/O法、A2/O法和SBR法生物除磷工艺。结果表明,它们的除磷效果好;污泥含磷量达6%以上、除磷系数达0.04左右,是常规好氧生物处理的3倍。在系统除磷系数相同的条件下,进水碳磷比越高,磷的去除率越高。生物除磷系统的污泥结构紧密,沉降性好。在本试验条件下,A2/O法去氮效果最好,是常规好氧法的3倍;SBR法次之;高速率A/O法因不能经反硝化作用脱氮,去氮效果与常规好氧法相同。The biological phosphorus removal processes of A/O, A2/O and SBR were compared and the results indicated that their removal effects were sound. The phosphorus concentration of the sludges was>6%,and phosphorus removal factor was about 0.04, which was two times higher than that of the resular aerobic biological treatment. For the same phosphorus removal factor,the higher the value of influent BOD5/PO43-was,the higher the phosphorus removal rate would be. The sludge in phosphorus removal system had compact structure and sound sedimentation ability. Among the three processes the nitrogen removal effect of A2/O process was the best, which was two times higher than that of the regular aerobic process, while; SBR process came second, and the short-term A/O process had the same nitrogen removal effect as that of the regular aerobic process because it could not remove nitrogen by denitrification.
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249