MONITOR-20自动血沉仪与经典魏氏法测定血沉结果的比较  

Evaluation of comparision between Wei Shi methods and MONITOR-20 analyzer in detecting ESR

作　　者：郑春盛[1] 王文华[2] 李雯[2] 施建东[3] 

机构地区：[1]福建中医学院附属省人民医院检验科,福州350004 [2]福建医科大学附属第一医院检验科 [3]福建医科大学检验系

出　　处：《中国实用医刊》2010年第1期29-30,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的 探讨MONITOR-20全自动血沉分析仪与魏氏法测定血沉差异的情况,分析两种方法测定结果的相关性,指导临床对两种结果的应用.方法 随机抽取门诊患者106例,同时采集两份标本,分别应用MONITOR-20自动血沉仪及经典魏氏法同时检测血沉(ESR),对数据进行统计学分析与比较.结果 MONITOR-20自动血沉仪与经典魏氏法测定血沉结果的相关性欠佳(γ=0.928,Y=0.832 X-0.542),且结果差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),MONITOR-20自动血沉仪测定结果偏低.结论 MONITOR-20自动血沉仪测定的血沉值还不能完全替代经典魏氏法测定的结果,应尽可能建立仪器法的相应参考范围,以提高其临床应用价值.Objective To compare ESR results of two different metods and to study the clinical application of automatic ESR analyzer.Methods Randomly selected 106 cases of out-patient, two samples collected at the same time, namely the application of ESR MONITOR-20 automatic devices and theclassic method for simultaneous detection of Clostridium ESR, statistical data analysis and comparison.Results ESR instrument automatically MONITOR-20 widmanstatten classical method of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of poor results (γ= 0.928, Y = 0.832 X-0.542), and the results of the existence of significant differences (P ＜ 0.05), MONITOR-20 automatically measure the results of ESR High.Conclusions ESR MONITOR-20 automatically measure the value of the ESR is also not a substitute for the classic method widmanstatten results, should be the establishment of the corresponding frame of reference in order to enhance its clinical value.

关 键 词：自动血沉仪 手工法 红细胞沉降率 

分 类 号：R446.1[医药卫生—诊断学]