小学生(四—六年级)学习能力倾向测验的初步编制Ⅱ:效度检验  

Scholastic Aptitude Test for Pupils of Grade 4- 6 II: Validity

作　　者：郭靖[1] 龚耀先[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2005年第3期271-273,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘　　要：目的:验证小学生(四—六年级)学习能力倾向测验的效度。方法:采用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析研究测验的结构效度;对测验分数与教师的评定等级进行相关分析,比较样本中来自不同等级学校、不同年级,或性别不同的学生之间测验得分的差异,以检验同时效度;以回归分析检验测验分数对语文、数学考试成绩的预测效度。结果:①探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均证实了原先设想的测验结构;②语文分量表的分数与教师评定的语文学习能力等级相关为0.53(A卷)或0.58(B卷),数理分量表分数与教师评定的数学能力等级相关为0.58(A卷)或0.56(B卷),空间分量表分数与数学能力等级相关为0.25(A卷)或0.31(B卷);各个分测验分数大体上均呈随年级而逐步递增的趋势;各分测验的得分呈现优等学校>中等学校>差等学校的趋势;女生在某些语文分测验上的分数明显优于男生(P均<0.05或0.01);③第一主成分回归的决定系数分别为:语文0.471(A卷)或0.386(B卷),数学0.491(A卷)或0.362(B卷)(P均<0.001)。结论:测验具有良好的结构效度、同时效度和预测效度。Objective： To examine the validity of the test, Methods： Examine construct validity by exploratory factor analysis （EFA） and confirmatory factor analysis （CFA）; examine concurrent validity by correlation analysis between test scores and teachers＇ rating and compare scores of pupils in different grades, different schools or of different sexes; examine predicting validity by component regression analysis for terminal exam scores. Results： ①By way of EFA and CFA, we proved the construct of the test;②There were significant correlations between test scores and teacher＇s rating; there were significant differences of scores between pupils from different grades and schools; girls performed better in some verbal subtests than boys （P 〈0.01or 0.05）; ③Regression showed that the R^2 coefficients for Chinese exam score were 0.471 （ Form A ） or 0.386 （Form B ）while the coefficients for Math score were 0.491 （Form A ） or 0.362 （Form B ） （ P 〈0.001）. Conclusion： The validities of the test are good.

关 键 词：能力倾向测验 效度 小学生 

分 类 号：G449.5[哲学宗教—心理学]