论监听作为取证手段的法律问题  

On the Juridical Questions of Monitoring as a Way of Collect Evidence

作　　者：徐晶[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法学院研究生院,上海200042

出　　处：《重庆邮电学院学报（社会科学版）》2005年第5期703-706,共4页Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications

摘　　要：监听对于侦查机关打击和惩罚犯罪发挥了极其重要的作用。但同时监听也是一把双刃剑,如对监听不加任何限制的采用又会严重侵犯公民的隐私权。因此,各国大都对监听的采用规定了严格的法律程序,以防止侦查机关滥用监听。我国虽然在侦查实践中对监听措施经常采用,但在刑事诉讼立法上对监听缺乏明确规定。规范监听立法及在证据效力上对其正确定位业已成为改革与完善侦查措施以及刑事证据制度的当务之急。Monitoring plays a very important role in combating and punishing crime. However, it is also a double -edged sword, will seriously violate civic privacy if without restriction. Thus, many countries made strict juridical process for monitoring to avoid the abuse of monitoring by scouting organs. Although monitoring is often used in scouting, clear regulation is absent in legislation of penal suit. Make criteria for legislation of monitoring and correctly oriented it in the validity of evidence are urgent affairs in reforming and perfecting scouting methods and the system of criminal evidence.

关 键 词：监听 监听原则 供述证据 证明地位 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]