检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任保秋[1]
出 处:《陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2005年第3期14-17,共4页Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:陕西省教育厅科研基金项目(03JK208)
摘 要:建国以来我国农村土地经营方式经历了三次变革,每一次变革都是为革除弊端追求潜在利润、提高效率发生的。目前家庭联产承包制已出现了制约农业发展的因素,第四次创新势在必然。本文通过对新中国农村土地经营方式变迁的回顾,认为新一轮探索创造应以本国历史道路为背景,把握历史惯性,寻求一种成本小、风险低、效益高的路径,现实选择应是规模经营,实行股份制。Rural land management in China has gone through three reforms in its pattems, each of which eliminated the existing defection for the potential profit at a better proficiency. The present pattern of household contract responsibility system is already hindering the further development of agriculture, signaling an inevitable fourth reform. This paper, with a review of the past management patterns, proposes that the new pattern should base it on the national history and consider the historic inertia in the pursuit for a pattern of low cost, less risk, and high efficiency, whereas the realistic choice for the moment is scale management and share-holding system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

