内地与澳门民事时效法律制度比较研究  

Contrast study on civil prescription legal system between China's Mainland and M acao

作　　者：韩一衍[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学法学院,广东广州510631

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2005年第4期101-103,共3页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：内地和澳门属于中国一个国家内的两个法域,两地由于历史和现实的原因,在民事时效法律制度上存在较大的差异。无论是在民事时效制度的立法模式、适用范围,还是在法律效果等方面均有不同的法律规定,研究这种差异,协调矛盾,互相借鉴,让两地的民事时效法律制度为经济建设服务,促进两地的经济交流。China's Mainland and Macao have different legal system though they are in one country. Because of historical background and the reality, the two regions have many different facets on the civil prescription legal system. These are legislation models and result of the fact. When we learn the different of them in these two regions, we can make it coordinate and serve the economic construction and economic exchange.

关 键 词：民事时效 取得时效 消灭时效 诉讼时效 

分 类 号：D908[政治法律—法学理论]