检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学电气工程学院
出 处:《电气化铁道》2005年第4期14-16,19,共4页Electric Railway
摘 要:针对信号中非周期分量,频率偏移,分数次谐波对基波分量计算精度的影响,对傅里叶、差分滤波和并联补偿3种滤波算法进行了分析比较。通过大量仿真计算,得出的结论是:并联补偿算法滤除非周期分量的效果最好;傅里叶算法在频率偏移的情况下稳定性要好于其他2种;存在分数次谐波时,差分滤波求得基波分量幅值和相角的误差最小。此结论对工程实际应用具有一定的指导意义。With regard to the accuracy affection during fundamental component calculation caused by aperiodic component, frequency deviation and fractional harmonic in signal, the paper analyzes and compares three filter algorithms of Fourier algorithm, differential filter algorithm and shunt compensation algorithm. The simulated calculation shows that shunt compensation algorithm has a best effect in filtering and eliminating the aperiodic component. The Fourier algorithm has a better stability than the other two algorithms when frequency deviation exists. The error of fundamental component and phase angle calculated by means of differential algorithms is the minimum value when fractional harmonic exists. The conclusion has some certain value of guidance for its application in actual engineering.
分 类 号:U224.4[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170