检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《心血管病学进展》2005年第B08期114-117,共4页Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases
摘 要:自从认识到心脏骤停作为心脏性猝死的机制具有很高的发生率以来,医学和临床医生一直在追求一种方法来预测及预防这些心血管事件。在室性心律失常患者中已经完成的一些安慰剂对照的抗心律失常药物试验并没有一致地认为抗心律失常药物治疗能够降低总病死率。近几年发表的临床随机试验证明,植入型心脏复律除颤器与传统的抗心律失常治疗相比,可降低高危亚组患者的病死率。然而,在患者中识别致死性室性心律失常的危险性及衡量使用植入型心脏复律除颤器治疗的价-效比已经成为当今的社会医学问题,尤其在美国。室性心律失常的治疗和心脏性猝死预防仍是将来需要关注的问题。Since the recognition of the high incidence of cardiac arrest as the mechanism of sudden cardiac death ( SCD ) , medical scientists and clinicians have sought methods to predict and prevent these events. Many placebo-controlled antiarrhythmic drug trials have been completed in ventricular arrhythmic patient groups,but these trials have not uniformly reported a benefit from antiarrhythmic drugs in reduction of all-cause mortality. Recently published randomized studies demonstrating that the implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( ICD ) provides a mortality benefit compared with conventional drug therapy in highly specific subsets of patients. However,identifying risk of fatal ventricular arrhythmias among the patients and cost-effectiveness of ICD has become a social medical problem,especially in USA. It is still needed to pay attention to the therapy of ventricular arrhythmia and prevention of SCD in the future.
关 键 词:室性心律失常 治疗 植入型心脏复律除颤器
分 类 号:R541.7[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7