检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市血液中心,518035
出 处:《临床输血与检验》2005年第4期252-254,共3页Journal of Clinical Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨不同时期招募的献血人群传播输血性感染(transfus ion-transm itted in fections,TT Is)的风险。方法以血液筛查合格率和血清感染标志物(in fectious d isease m arkers,IDM s)HB sA g、抗-HCV、抗-H IV和梅毒的检出率作为评价依据。结果招募的献血人群血液筛查合格率依次为早期有偿人群82.6%、早期无偿人群89.4%、定期有偿人群93.5%和近期无偿人群9 4.8%,人均年献血小板2.8次者抗-HCV血清阳性率为0.1 1 0%、HB sA g为0.0 5 7%、梅毒为0.038%,未有H IV感染者的定期无偿机采人群。结论招募的定期无偿机采人群显示出低IDM s水平的特征,属于低风险人群。Objective To explore the risk of transfusion-transmitted infection among blood donation population recruited at different phases. Method The evaluation of blood safety was made against different blood donation population by eligible rates of blood screening tests and seropositive rates of infectious disease markers, HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV and syphilis. Results The places of the eligible rates for blood donation population from low to high in turn were paid population (82.6%),unpaid population (89. 4%) recruited at early phase of the blood conversion,regular paid population (93.5 %) and unpaid population (94.8%) recruited at late phase, and then the regular non-remunerated apheresis population. Among the people who repeated blood donations about 2.8 times per year,the seropositive rates of anti-HCV, HBsAg and syphilis were 0. 110% ,0. 057% and 0. 038% ,resepectively, and no HIV carriers were found. Conclusion The recruitment for regular unpaid apheresis population had access to the low risk population with characteristics of low level of IDMs.
关 键 词:献血 感染性疾病标志物 低风险人群 传播输血性感染
分 类 号:R193.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R51[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117