从国际法角度看受教育权的权利性质  

作　　者：杨成铭[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法律系

出　　处：《法学研究》2005年第5期125-132,共8页Chinese Journal of Law

摘　　要：国际人权法主要文书的内容和精神都表明受教育权是一项基本人权而不附带任何义务,战后各国的国内法的修改也表现出接受这种精神的趋向。保障公民的受教育权要求国家承担起相应的义务。我国要顺应国际人权法发展的要求,在条件成熟时对宪法的相关条款进行修改,删除公民有受教育的义务的提法。The main documents regarding international law of human rights indicate that the right to receive education is the fundamental right without any subsidiary obligation. And the amendment of relevant domestic laws after the World War II also demonstrates such tendency. The guarantee of the right to receive education demands countries to undertake corresponding obligations. China ought to comply with the development of international law of human rights, and delete the provision that declares the right to receive education is civil obligation in the current Constitution.

关 键 词：《经济 社会和文化权利国际公约》 受教育权 基本人权 权利性质 国际法 国际人权法 义务 国内法 精神 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]