检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚琪[1]
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学体育部,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《北京体育大学学报》2005年第10期1370-1371,1385,共3页Journal of Beijing Sport University
摘 要:将我国成年人体质测试的方法组成与国际公认的组织包括ICRFRI、BP、WHO所公布的体质测验方案以及美国的AAHPER组织、加拿大的CHFT组织、日本的国民体力测验方案作了比较,可以看出从事这方面工作的各个组织,在解释体力测验问题时使用了共同的概念,他们的测验项目基本上是一致的;然而,由于各组织观点不同,测验的项目侧重点也有明显的差别。清楚地了解它们之间的相似和不同,对于我们体育工作者的学习和研究是十分重要的。This paper conducted a comparative analysis on the measurement of Chinese adult constitution and the standards generated by the internationally accepted organizations, including ICRFR, IBP, WHO, and American AAHER Organization, Canadian CHFT Organization, as well as Japanese National Constitution Measurement. It was found that the relevant organizations took the same concept in explaining constitution measurement, and their test items seemed to be similar. However, since the different organizations had the different viewpoints, their emphasis on the test items showed significant differences. It is essential for the PE teachers and researchers to make a good understanding about the commonness and differences among the different standards.
分 类 号:G804.49[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15