中爱两国国家养老储备基金管理制度比较研究  

Comparative Study on the Management of National Pension Reserve Fund between China and Ireland

作　　者：刘子兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学社会保险研究所

出　　处：《中国人口科学》2005年第4期32-39,共8页Chinese Journal of Population Science

基　　金：本文是国家社科基金项目(编号:04CJY025)"全国社保基金安全运行问题研究"的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国全国社会保障基金本质上属于公共养老基金,它与爱尔兰国家养老储备基金具有许多相似性,合理吸收和借鉴爱尔兰国家养老储备基金的管理经验有重要的现实意义。文章介绍了爱尔兰养老金制度结构,讨论了国家养老储备基金建立的经济条件,并就中爱两国养老储备基金的融资来源、管理机构和投资策略进行了对比分析。研究表明,两国养老储备基金管理均存在一定的政治风险,确保理事会的独立性是减少政治风险的有效途径之一。The National Social Security Fund (SSF) in China is a public pension fund in essence, which shares similarities with the National Pension Reserve Fund in Ireland. It is therefore important and realistic to learn some management experience from the latter. This paper introduces the structure of the pension system in Ireland, discusses the economic conditions of establishing the National Pension Reserve Fund, compares the financial sources, management institutions and investment strategies of the Funds in the two countries. The conclusion shows that there are some political risks in the management of the Funds in both countries. One of the effective ways of reducing the political risks is to ensure the independence of the National Council for SSF.

关 键 词：国家养老储备基金 管理制度 中国 爱尔兰 经济条件 融资方式 

分 类 号：F841[经济管理—保险]