两种气功对模拟失重对抗能力的比较研究  

Comperison of Effects of Two Qigong Methods on Counteragent to Simulated Weightlessness.

作　　者：谢俊水[1] 宋孔智[1] 单毅[1] 张静雪[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京航天医学工程研究所

出　　处：《航天医学与医学工程》1996年第5期335-340,共6页Space Medicine & Medical Engineering

摘　　要：为了比较两种气功对模拟失重的对抗能力，观察了７７名男性青年被试者。其中１０名为未练过任何气功的对照组；１７名为大专气功二年级学生，修练动功１年多为气功１组。５０名相当于大专的气功师资班学生练的是智能气功，为气功Ⅱ组。以受试者头低位（─３０°）３０ｍｉｎ作为模拟失重的急性刺激，观察心搏量、下肢血流、血压、心率、膻中和劳宫穴的皮肤温度变化。结果表明，在头低位（─３０°）的刺激下，气功组的下肢血流增加，明显高于对照组，且具有统计学意义。而气功Ⅱ组又好于气功Ⅰ组。对照组的舒张血压升高，达１４％，而气功Ⅰ组只增加４％，气功Ⅱ组则未有增减。同时，气功组的膻中、劳宫穴皮肤温度也明显高于对照组。证明，气功组与对照组相比，有较高的对抗模拟失重能力。两组气功组相比，则气功Ⅱ组对模拟失重有更好的对抗能力。Healthy subjects were divided into three groups.The control group includes 10male aged 19.8±1.4years;Qigong group includes 17 male aged 20.7± 1.6 years;Qigonggroup Ⅱ includes 50 male aged 22.5±1.9 years.The subjects in control group has not beentrained,while subjects in Qigong Ⅰ and Qigong Ⅱ have been trained to practice Qigong butwith different methods for one vear.Head-down-tilt(-30°)for 30 min was used asweightlessness simulation.Changes of strike volume(SV).lower limb blood flow(LBF).blood pressure,heart rate and temperature at Shanzhong,Laogong were measured and com-pared.The results clearly showed that both Qigong groups had improved counteragent a-gainst weightlessness stimulation and the method used by Qigong group Ⅱ is more effective.

关 键 词：气功 失重模拟 失重生理影响 对抗措施 

分 类 号：R852.22[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]