检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏明英[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2005年第11期51-54,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:我国现行个人所得税采用的是分类所得税模式,该种模式已不适应我国当前社会经济的发展。通过对综合所得税、分类所得税、分类综合所得税三种税制模式优缺点及适用条件的阐述说明,分析我国分类所得税存在的弊端及改革之必然,即最早在2006年采用分类综合所得税制模式;此种模式是我国借鉴国内外实践之经验、从理论上比较三种模式之优劣、分析考虑我国之具体国情的理性选择。The classify income tax model is adopted in Chinese individual income tax, it doesn't fit development of Chinese society and economic. In this paper, author expounds strongpoint and disadvantages of synthesize income tax system and classify income tax system model and classify synthesize income tax system, as well as their applicable conditions, besides author analyses abuse of China actual classify income tax model and necessity of reform that model, that is, put in practice the classify synthesize income tax system model; the model is a rational selection that is to benefit from foreign experience, to compare with strongpoint and disadvantage of three models in theory, to consider Chinese the situation of a country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229