民间舆论如何看待秋瑾案——兼与李细珠先生商榷  

The Public Opinions on Qiu Jin Case-A Discussion with Mr. Li Xizhu

作　　者：马自毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系

出　　处：《史林》2005年第5期1-20,共20页Historical Review

摘　　要：《互动》对秋瑾案中“民间舆论”与“官府作为”及其互动提出很有见地的看法,也有严重失实之处。在君权大于法权的时代,“讯明口供后就地正法”并于事后上报,就是皇帝钦定的法律和司法程序。舆论集矢于张曾(?)以革命罪杀害从未革命的“弱女子”秋瑾,痛斥官府制造冤案。其原因既是清政府权威丧失,也与延续千年仍是当时社会主流意识的性别与社会角色观念有关。1907年前后,“以立宪消弭外患”、“以立宪消除革命”,是清政府与民间舆论之间的“共识”,“预备立宪”是双方都在利用的“话语资源”和攻击对方的“武器”。且史料与学术规范等,似亦有可探讨之处。Mr. Li shed his light on both 'public opinions' and 'the role of government' and their interaction on Qiu Jin Case in his paper, but some evidence of his statements was unfounded. The wrongly judged Qiu Jin Case was the result of the decaying Qing Dynasty and the public opinions on women's role then. Besides, much room was left for further discussion on historical data and academic norms in Mr. Li' s paper.

关 键 词：民间舆论 弱女子秋瑾 冤案 预备立宪 学术规范 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]