刑事诉讼证明问题的实体法依据——兼论刑事实体法与程序法的一体化  

The Basis of Substantial Law about Proving Problem in Criminal Procedure

作　　者：聂昭伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省高级人民法院刑二庭,浙江杭州310012

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2005年第6期81-88,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：推定是刑事实体法与程序法中同时存在的范畴,构成了二者之间的联结点。刑事诉讼中证明责任分配与证明标准选择的依据,实际上源于实体法中犯罪构成体系的推定机能。我国犯罪构成体系源自前苏联,前苏联在改造大陆法系犯罪构成体系时,在内容上抛弃了违法性要件,并在结构上破坏了其层次性,导致该体系推定机能的丧失。为此,需要恢复我国犯罪构成体系的推定机能,以实现犯罪构成对刑事诉讼证明问题的指导功能,实现刑事实体法与程序法的一体化。Presumption is a concept which exists in the fields of criminal substantial law and criminal procedure law, and constitutes the coupling point of these kinds of laws. In the field of criminal procedure law, the basis about the burden and the standard of proof roots from the function of presumption of the crime constitution. The constitution of crime in our country comes directly from the former Soviet Union. When the former Soviet Union established its own system about the constitution of crime, it abandoned the element of illegality and broke the level of structure, which made the function of presumption lost. So we should resume the function of presumption in our country＇s system of the crime constitution to realize the instruction function of the crime constitution and the integration of criminal substantial law and criminal procedure law.

关 键 词：推定 犯罪构成 证明责任 证明标准 刑事实体法 证明问题 刑事诉讼 程序法 一体化 实体法依据 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学] G633.6[政治法律—法学]