检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈勇[1] 佘守章[2] 闫焱[2] 许学兵[2] 许立新[2]
机构地区:[1]海南省人民医院麻醉科,海口市570311 [2]广州医学院附属广州市第一人民医院麻醉科
出 处:《临床麻醉学杂志》2005年第10期662-664,共3页Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基 金:广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助项目(A2002573)
摘 要:目的比较脑电双频指数(BIS)和听觉诱发电位指数(AEPI)在丙酚靶控镇静深度的临床价值。方法45例腰-硬联合麻醉术中需丙泊酚镇静病人,ASAⅠ级,腰麻平面确定后开始丙泊酚靶控输注镇静。结果(1)丙泊酚镇静期BIS、AEPI逐渐降低,苏醒期逐渐升高(P<0.01),而AEPI则在意识转换过程中变化更敏感(P<0.01)。(2)在丙泊酚镇静期和苏醒期BIS、AEPI与丙泊酚EC密切相关。(3)在丙泊酚镇静期,联合监测当BIS≤63和AEPI≤30时敏感度即可达100%。结论BIS和AEPI是监测麻醉镇静深度的良好指标,BIS和AEPI联合监测提高了诊断的敏感度。Objective To compare the value of sedation depth monitoring with bispectral index (B/S) and auditory evoked potential index(AEPl). Methods Fouty-five patients under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were sedated with propofol target controlled infusion(TCI). During sedation and emergence from anesthesia, the BIS, AEPI and prOpofol effective concentrations (EC) were recorded when EC was increased or decreased by 0.1μg/ml each time. Results (1)During sedation and emergence from anesthesia, the values of BIS and AEPI gradually decreased and increased respectively,in which the change of AEPI was more sensitive than that of BIS(P〈0.01). (2)During sedation,the values of BIS and AEPI were closely correlated with propofol EC. (3)During sedation with propofol TCI,the sensitivity of BIS≤63 and AEPI≤30 was 100%. Conclusion BIS and AEPI are good predictors of the level of sedation during propofol infusion, especially combined use of BIS and AEPI.
关 键 词:听觉诱发电位 脑电双频指数 丙泊酚 镇静 镇静深度 联合监测 BIS 腰-硬联合麻醉 听觉诱发电位指数 脑电双频指数 靶控输注镇静 丙泊酚 临床价值
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.171.58