检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福州大学土木建筑工程学院,福建福州350002
出 处:《地震工程与工程振动》2005年第5期147-152,共6页Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基 金:福建省科技攻关重点项目(2003H027)
摘 要:既有桥梁结构承载能力的评估涉及桥梁状态评定、养护与管理、维修与加固等,不仅是桥梁工程师的基本职责,也是广大业主所非常关心的。本文指出了桥梁评估与设计的基本区别,介绍了桥梁承载力评估的静力方法,分析了中美两国桥梁评估规范的异同。接着提出了一套既有桥梁结构承载能力评估的动力方法,该方法结合现场环境振动试验和有限元分析,具有显著的优点。文中采用2个典型桥例,分析了不同评估方法的结果与结论。最后依据发展要求,讨论了进一步研究的主要方向。The load-carrying capacity assessment of existing bridges is associated with the bridge condition evaluation, maintenance, management, repairing and strengthening. It has become of increasing importance for both bridge design engineers and construction owners. In this paper, the differences between the design and assessment of bridges are addressed and the assessment methods in the specifications of China and America are compared. First, the statics-based assessment methods are discussed. Then, a dynamic-based assessment procedure is proposed, which involves both field ambient vibration testing and finite element analysis and updating. Two typical existing bridges are used as the case studies to simulate the process of evaluation. Finally, further research needs in the load-carrying capacity assessment of existing bridges are presented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.236.97