检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张平洋[1] 邓又斌[2] 杨好意[2] 潘敏[2] 毕小军[2]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属南京第一医院心血管超声科 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院超声影像科
出 处:《中国临床药理学与治疗学》2005年第9期1001-1004,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
摘 要:目的:研究辛伐他丁对原发性高血压(EH)患者左室重量(LVM)的影响。方法:采用随机、对照、单盲法将50例EH患者分为两组:联合用药组(口服辛伐他丁和利尿剂)、利尿药组(口服利尿剂)各25例,超声观察治疗12周前后患者左室重量指数(LVMI)。25例正常人作为对照组,不予任何治疗。结果:与正常对照组(88.79±22.73g·m-2)相比,治疗前两组患者的LVMI均增大(133.61±31.02,118.04±39.62g·m-2,P<0.01或0.0001),血压增高,而年龄、血脂、血糖无显著性差异(P>0.05)。治疗后联合用药组患者的LVMI显著减小(91.07±16.01g·m-2VS133.61±31.02g·m-2,P<0.01),而利尿药组LVMI无明显改变;联合用药组患者的左室重量指数变化率(LVMICH)较利尿药组显著增大(P<0.05),而血压、血糖、血脂无显著差异。治疗前后两组患者的血压下降至正常,但血脂、血糖无显著性变化。相关分析显示,联合用药组患者的左室重量指数变化率与血压、血糖和血脂的变化率间无有意义相关性(P>0.05)。结论:辛发他丁可以抑制EH患者左室重量增加,这一作用不依赖血压和血脂、血糖等改变独立存在。AIM: To evaluate the effect of simvastatin on the left ventricular mass in patients with essential hypertension (EH). METHODS: 50 patients with hypertension without severe complication were randomly divided into two treatment groups: combination treatment group and hydragogue group, and 25 normal subjects without any treatment were taken as the control. The 25 patients in combination treatment group were given simvastatin and hydragogue for 12 weeks while the other patients in hydragogue groupwere given hydragogue during the same time. The left ventricular mass was examined from uhrasonography in all patients before and after treatment. RESULTS: The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was higher in the two treatment groups of patients (133.61±31.02, 118.04±39.62g·m^-2) than that in the control group (88.79±22.73g·m^-2) before treatment (P〈0.01, 0.0001, respectively) while the blood pressure was higher. There was no significantly difference in age, serum concentrations of total cholesterol or triglyceride, sugar and blood pressure between the two treatment groups and the control group (P〉0.05). There was no significant difference in all variables between the two treatment groups before treatment. After treatment, the LVMI was decreased (133.61±31.02 vs 91.07±16.01g·m^-2, P〈0.01) in the combination treatment group while there was no significant change in LVMI in the hydragogue group compared with the control group. The blood pressure in the two treatment groups was decreased to the normal. Compared with hydragogue group, the change of LVMI was higher in the combination group though the serum concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride or sugar were not significantly different. No significant change in serum concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride or sugar was found during treatment in the two groups. The change of LVMI did not correlate with the change of blood pressure, sermn concentrations of total cholesterol , triglyceride or sugar in the combinat
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7