知识产权财产化批判与超越  

On Animadversion and Transcension of Intellectual Property Propertization

作　　者：何炼红[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《时代法学》2005年第5期48-54,共7页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目<工业版权研究>(项目合同号:03SFB3014)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：知识产权财产化的误区在于视知识产权为一种绝对的财产权。事实上,知识产权语境下不存在公地悲剧,财产权的经济学理论亦不能证明知识产权正外部性内在化的正当性,我们根据搭便车来思考知识产权是错误的。然而,经济学理论也无法告诉我们,如何在私人产权和公共领域之间划定一条正确的界限。知识产权的最佳保护范围,应根据具体产业中创新的种类、本质和市场环境的不同而变化。Copyleft规则即为超越知识产权财产化提供了一个极好的范例。A misleading area of intellectual property propertization exist in viewing intellectual property as a absolute property. In fact, There is no tragedy of the commons in intellectual property context and economic theory of property can not justify internalize positive externalities in intellectual property. It is err for us to treat intellectual property with free riding. However, economic theory can not tell us how to draw a right line between the private rights and the public domain . the optimum level of intellectual property protection vary with the creation type , nature and marketable environment. Copyleft rules offer a wonderful paradigm to exceed propertization of intellectual property.

关 键 词：知识产权 财产化 搭便车 平衡 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]