检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省巢湖市第二人民医院骨科,安徽巢湖238000
出 处:《安徽医药》2005年第10期764-765,共2页Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨不同方法治疗后臀肌挛缩症的临床疗效,为临床医师选择合理的治疗方法提供参考。方法将86例臀肌挛缩症按病情轻重分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ度。Ⅰ度患者采用单纯物理疗法;Ⅱ度及Ⅲ度患者采用手术治疗及物理疗法。结果Ⅰ度患者4例,物理治疗优良率为50%。Ⅱ、Ⅲ度患者82例,手术治疗加物理疗法,优良率达98%。结论对Ⅰ度患者应首先选择物理疗法。对Ⅱ、Ⅲ度患者,手术治疗固然重要,但术后的正确物理治疗亦不容忽视。术后及时、正确的物理治疗能巩固手术疗效,提高治疗的优良率。Aim To offer the reference of the therapy for the orthopeadic doctors by appraising the curative effect ofter treatment with different methods. Methods 86 patients were divided into Ⅰ (4) , Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups (84) according to the condition of patients. Group Ⅰ were only treated by physical therapy, groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were treated by surgical therapy and physical therapy. Results The curative rate of group Ⅰ was 50%, The curative rate of groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ counted to 98%, Conclusions Physical therapy is firstly chosen to group Ⅰ. Surgical therapy is certainly important for the patients in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ ,but physical therapy can not be neglected ofter operation. If it is timely and correctly used, the curative rate can be increased ,
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222