检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]川北医学院附属医院广安市人民医院介入治疗中心,四川广安638000 [2]四川广能集团总医院放射科,四川广安638000
出 处:《华西医学》2005年第4期686-687,共2页West China Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨腰椎间盘突出物(髓核)内及硬膜外腔注入胶原酶溶解术的疗效。材料和方法:在CT导引下经椎板间孔穿刺注入胶原酶治疗163例腰椎间盘突出症患者,其中62例实施硬膜外腔内注药,另一组101例实施突出物内注药。根据日本骨科学会制定的腰腿痛疗效判断标准[1],对两组病例术后疗效进行随访比较。结果:突出物(髓核)内注药法:优41例,占40.59%;良51例,占50.5%;可6例,占5.94%;差3例,占2.97%。硬膜外腔注药法:优14例,占22.58%;良28例,占45.16%;可13例,占20.97%;差7例,占11.29%。两组疗效进行χ2检验(χ20.005(3)=15.69,P<0.005)有显著差异。结论:突出物(髓核)内注药疗效明显,其效果优于硬膜外腔内注药。Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of transdermal collagenase injection into the protrusion or epidural cavity for lumbar disc herniation. Method: Total 163 cases of lumbar disc herniations were randomly divided into two groups: the first group, injection of collagenase into the epidural cavity was carried out in 62 cases under the guidance of CT; and the second group of 101 cases into the protrusions. The curative effects were compared during the 9 months follow- up after operation, according to the standard by the thopaedic Association of Japan. Results: In the first group, there were 14 cases having excellent outcomes (22.58%); 28cases with good outcomes (45.16%) ; 13 cases with moderate improvement (20.97%) ; and 7 cases with poor outcomes ( 11.29% ). Compared with it, the pecond group, 41 cases had excellent outcomes (40.59%) ; 51 cases with good ouecomes (50.5%); 6 cases with moderate improvement (5.94%); and 4 cases with pour outcomes (2.97%). Chi - Square test shows that there was significant difference of the curative effects between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 005 ). Conclusions: The curative effect of injection into protrusions was much better than that into the epidural cavity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15