从请求行为管窥两种语用推理图式的异同  

Schematic Analysis of P&T and C&S Discourse Request Acts

作　　者：张韧弦[1] 熊学亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海200433

出　　处：《外语学刊》2005年第6期12-17,共6页Foreign Language Research

摘　　要：Panther&Thornburg(1998)的借喻性推理图式(P&T图式)和Cooren&Sanders(2002)的叙事性组合图式(C&S图式)都是研究语用推理的宏观图式模型。本文采用两个请求行为的实例检验了两种图式的实际效力,并在此基础上对两者的异同作出全面的评比。虽然两种语用推理图式各有得失,但将两者适当地结合起来,不仅能优势互补,而且能拓宽理论的适用领域,为语用推理图式理论的进一步发展打下基础。The metonymic inferencing schema developed by Panther & Thornburg(1998)and the narrative syntagmatic schema developed by Cooren & Sanders(2002)are two representative approaches in the realm of modeling pragmatic inference. Tested against the same two request speech acts, the two schemata are comprehensively compared in this essay. In spite of the disadvantages revealed for each schema, a mutually beneficial combination of them will break new application horizons for the theory, laying a foundation for the further development of the schematic approach to pragmatic inference

关 键 词：语用推理 P&T图式 C&S图式 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]