检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈炼[1] 张国林[1] 林少姗[1] 杨路敏[1] 邱秋裕[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省人民医院广东省老年医学研究所,广州510080
出 处:《中华流行病学杂志》2005年第10期808-810,共3页Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基 金:广东省科学技术研究基金资助项目(A2002007)
摘 要:目的探讨健康教育对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)稳定期患者肺功能和生活质量的影响。方法117例稳定期COPD患者随机分为4组,其中Ⅰ组31例、Ⅱ组26例、Ⅲ组20例、Ⅳ组40 例。Ⅰ组患者不接受健康教育,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组依次接受1、2、3次或3次以上系统的COPD健康教育。对比观察4组患者干预前及6个月后FEV1、FEV1%预计值、FEV1/FVC和生活质量评分(SGRQ评分)。结果健康教育对延缓稳定期COPD患者FEV1、FEV1%预计值以及FEV1/FVC下降有明显作用,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组优于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),Ⅲ、Ⅳ组优于Ⅰ、Ⅱ组(P<0.05)。同时对稳定期COPD患者生活质量指数(SGRQ分值)升高有明显作用,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组优于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),Ⅲ、Ⅳ组优于Ⅰ、Ⅱ组(P<0.05)。结论健康教育能明显延缓稳定期COPD患者肺功能和生活质量下降。Objective To evaluate the effect of health education on lung function and quality of life in stabilized patients with chronic pulmonary disease(COPD). Methods 117 stabilized COPD patients were randomly derided into 4 groups with numbers as 31,26,20 and 40 identified as Groups 1 to 4. Patients in Group 1 did not receive health education, but Groups 2,3 and 4 received one, two, three or more times health education in file. FEV1,FEV1% ,FEV1/FVC and SGRQ score were compared pre and 6-month post the health education program. Results Health education seemed successful in delaying the decline of FEV1, FEV % , FEV1/FVC and groups 2-4 were superior to group 1 (P 〈 0.05) while groups 3 and 4 were superior to groups 1 or 2(P 〈 0.05). Health education was effective in raising the SGRQ score among the stabilized COPD patients with groups 2-4 superior to group 1 (P 〈 0.05) while groups 3 and 4 superior to groups 1 or 2(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Health education could effectively delay the decline of both lung function and quality of life in stabilized patients with COPD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.105