检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学工业工程系,北京100084 [2]清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084
出 处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2005年第11期1581-1584,共4页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70372005);深圳物流中心基金资助项目
摘 要:为了研究当零售商间存在竞争时的供应链信息共享价值,基于单供应商、两零售商的两层供应链中成本信息共享的模型,研究了两个零售商间存在B ertrand竞争时,零售商与供应商间的成本信息共享价值问题,分别讨论了两个零售商都共享成本信息、只有一个零售商共享成本信息和两个零售商都不共享成本信息时供应链各成员的收益。结果表明:供应商总能从成本信息共享中获益;但成本信息共享使零售商的收益减少,零售商并不能自愿地向供应商共享其成本信息;然而完全的信息共享在一些条件下可以通过一定的合同机制,即供应商向零售商付一定的费用来实现。A two-level supply chain with one manufacturer in the upstream and two competing retailers in the downstream was used to investigate the value of information sharing in a supply chain with competing retailers. The retailers are assumed to be engaged in a Bertrand competition. The benefits to all members of the supply chain of information sharing are evaluated for no retailers sharing their cost information, only one sharing, or both sharing their information. The results show that with Bertrand competition between the retailers, the manufacturer is always better off with cost information sharing but the retailers are always worse off and that no cost information will be shared with the manufacturer on a voluntary basis. The results also show that for certain conditions complete information sharing can be achieved through a side payment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28