检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付俊卿 杨学春[2] 齐永峰[2] 孙剑锋[2] 董希斌[2] 徐茂坤 王宝平 王宪忠
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省带岭林业局,带岭153106 [2]东北林业大学
出 处:《东北林业大学学报》2005年第6期118-119,共2页Journal of Northeast Forestry University
基 金:黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GC04B611)
摘 要:采用现场数据收集和定量分析的方法,从集材距离、集材时间和趟载量3个方面,对不同采伐方式下,落叶松人工林畜力集材的效率进行比较研究。结果表明:无论采用皆伐还是采用择伐生产方式,随着集材时间和集材距离的增加,集材效率均降低。在皆伐伐区,趟载量与集材效率的关系不明显;在择伐伐区,集材效率随着趟载量的增加而降低。对于平缓坡的落叶松人工林,皆伐伐区的畜力集材生产率要优于择伐伐区畜力集材生产率。The operation efficiencies of animal skidding under different cutting modes for larch plantations were compared in terms of skidding distance, skidding time and skidding quantity per skidding circle using the methods of data collection on the sites and quantitative analysis. Results showed that for both clear cutting and selective cutting, the skidding efficiencies reduced with increasing skidding time and skidding distance. The relationship between skidding efficiencies and skidding quantity per skidding circle were not evident in clear cutting areas, while in selective cutting areas, the skidding efficiencies declined with increasing skidding quantity. For larch plantations located on the gentle slope, the operation productivity of animal skidding in clear cutting areas is better than that in selective cutting areas.
分 类 号:S782.23[农业科学—木材科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.9.170