对“词类活用”说的再认识  

Re-recognition of the Theory of Flexible Usage of Parts of Speech

作　　者：李荣刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]徐州师范大学文学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第6期42-44,共3页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：徐州师范大学社会科学基金项目(03XWB05)

摘　　要：古代汉语中的词类活用问题和现代汉语的“名物化”问题如出一辙:“名物化”理论是参照印欧语体系而抹杀了现代汉语自身特点的产物;“词类活用”说则是参照了现代汉语体系而抹杀了古代汉语(文言)自身特点的产物。某些词的固有的功能属性特点为我们认识“词类活用”说提供了认知上的依据。我国的语法传统是“让语法学更有效地为我们的语文教育服务”。“词类活用”说正是这一传统的历史的产物。The flexible usage of parts of speech in ancient Chinese is exactly the same with “nominalization” in modem Chinese. The theory of “nominalization” is the product of reference to the system of European language so as to obliterate the features of modem Chinese and the flexible usage of parts of speech is the product of reference to the system of modem Chinese language so as to obliterate the features of ancient Chinese. The inherent function, property and features of some words offer cognitive basis for us to study the flexible usage of parts of speech. The grammatical tradition is to “make grammar serve Chinese education effectively”. The flexible usage of parts of speech is a historical product of this tradition.

关 键 词：名物化 词类活用 语法传统 

分 类 号：H146.2[语言文字—汉语]