检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩晖[1]
出 处:《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2005年第4期77-83,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"<文选>分类研究"(01BZW015)
摘 要:《文心雕龙》不是影响《文选》赋分类和选赋定篇的唯一作品,但它是影响《文选》赋分类及选赋的较直接的重要作品之一,对其影响不能估计太高,但也不能估计太低。《文选》赋分类定篇与《文心雕龙》论赋在“原始表末”、“释名章义”、“别体分类”与“选文定篇”四方面都不同程度地存在着相同或相异之处。其相同处表明刘勰与萧统赋学观上有一致的地方及刘勰对萧统可能产生的影响,其不同则表明二人赋学观的差异。Wen Xin Diao Long is not the only one classical work but one of the important works that rather directly affected the anthological classification of “Fu” in Wen Xuan. But its impact could neither be overestimated nor underestimated regarding the matter. Similarities and differences could be found in four aspects between the two classical works in the interpretation and anthological classification of “Fu”. Their similarities show the identical views on “Fu” between Liu Xie and Xiao Tong, and the possible influence of the former on the latter;the differences reveals the disagreement on “Fu” between the two authors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.10.46