检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛锐[1]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学历史文化与社会发展学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2005年第6期83-87,共5页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:战后英国政府形成的一整套国有化企业的管理机制存在许多弊病,这成为撒切尔政府大力推行私有化的一个重要起因。当私有化进入到基础设施产业后,随着产权的转移,迫使英国政府加大对基础设施产业的政府管制体制的改革力度,以解决私有化过程中出现的各种问题。英国政府管制体制改革的核心内容是不断强化竞争机制,合理平衡社会消费者和企业利益。政府管制体制改革成为英国私有化政策的重要组成部分,是英国私有化的一种延续,是对私有化政策的一种有益补充。The disadvantages in the administrative system of the British government' s nationalization policies since world War Ⅱ are one of the main reasons for the Thatcher administration to put privatization in force on a large scale. When it comes into infrastructures, the transfer of property rights forces the British government to widen the reform of administratire system so as to solve the various problems met with during the process of privatization. And the kernel of this reform is to repeatedly strengthen the mechanism of competition, and to reasonably balance the interests of the consumers and the enterprises. As a result, this reform becomes part of, and an extension of, the British privatization policies as a beneficial complement to these policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.204