检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《节能技术》2005年第6期483-487,共5页Energy Conservation Technology
摘 要:以湖南宁乡县莘田、江湾两村为研究对象,对农村住宅能耗情况进行了调查分析。莘田村为常规能源使用村,江湾村为沼气普及村。文章对比分析了两村的能耗现状及产生该现状的原因,进而定量分析了沼气替代生物质能和一次能源所带来的经济和环境效益。结论表明,以生物质能占据重要比例,多种能源并存的复杂能源结构在农村住宅用能中仍处于主导地位,且能耗量还处于较高水平;沼气的推广使用对优化能源使用结构,降低总能耗量及农户经济支出,减少有害气体的排放量以及保护生态平衡等具有积极作用。常规能源和生态能源两者的对比分析,为农村住宅能耗的未来发展提供了指导依据。Investigations on rural residential energy consumption were carried out in Xintian and Jiangwan villages of Ningxiang county, Hunan province. Common energy is used in Xintian village while marsh gas is popularized in Jiangwan village. The actuality and reasons of energy consumption for the two villages are analyzed by contrast. Sequentially the economic and environmental benefits are calculated when marsh gas is used instead of biologic energy and primary energy. Conclusions are summarized as follows: the complicated energy structure that biologic energy contributes a significant proportion and manifold energy exists synchronously is still dominant, and the energy consumption is in high lever; while the usage of marsh gas makes a great contribution to optimizing the energy consumption structure, decreasing the total amount of energy consumption and domestic cost, discharging less harmful gas and achieving the zoology balance. It provides the guidance for the future of rural residential energy consumption to contrast common energy with ecotype energy.
关 键 词:农村住宅能耗 沼气 生态能源 能源使用结构 经济环境效益
分 类 号:TU201.5[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28