检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《水利水运工程学报》2005年第4期11-18,共8页Hydro-Science and Engineering
摘 要:利用土石坝有限元应力变形计算分析中常用的邓肯E-ν模型、修正剑桥模型和南水模型,计算新疆“635”水利枢纽砂砾石粘土心墙坝和云南鲁布革堆石风化料心墙坝的应力变形,将计算结果分别与两座心墙坝相对应的原型观测资料进行比较和分析后表明,3种模型均能较好地模拟施工期心墙坝的应力变形性状,而在模拟蓄水期心墙坝应力变形性状时则存在不足.当计入湿化变形和流变变形的影响之后,用南水模型可较好地模拟心墙坝的应力变形性状.Three constitutive models, Duncan E-v model, modified Cambridge model and Nanshui model, which are commonly used in finite element analyses of earth-rock dams, are used to calculate stresses and deformations of “635” Clay-core Gravel Sand Dam in Xinjiang and the Lubuge Weathering-material Rock-fill Dam in Yunnan Province. Comparison between the numerical simulation results and the measured data in-situ shows that the three constitutive models can well simulate the stress and deformation behaviors of the above two dams in the construction stage; however, in storage stage, the simulation results are not satisfactory. And the Nanshui model can well simulate the stress and deformation behaviors of core-wall dams when the wetting deformation and rheology are considered.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63