析合同法移植期前违约制度的合理性  

Study on the Reasonableness of the Introduction of Anticipatory Breach of Contract in Chinese Contract Law

作　　者：李祖华[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学法政经济学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《行政与法》2005年第12期116-119,共4页Administration and Law

摘　　要：期前违约制度起源于英美法系。我国1999年颁布的《合同法》明确引入了期前违约制度,然而,对我国《合同法》移植期前违约制度,许多学者提出了质疑。笔者通过对英美法系的期前违约制度与大陆法系的不安抗辩权的对比分析,论证了《合同法》移植期前违约制度的合理性。The doctrine of anticipatory breach of contact that originated from Anglo-American law system was introduced into the contract law,1999 in China.But since its introduction.it has been distrusted by some Chinese legal scholars analyzing and commenting the advantages and the disadvantages of the anticipatory, breach of Contract and the system of inassured pleading of contract in Continental law system,the auther holds thai the doctrine of anticipatory breach of contract should he introduced into the Chinese Contract Law.

关 键 词：期前违约 不安抗辩权 合理性 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]