不同备药方法对静脉输液配置室内洁净度的影响  

The influence to the air particle in the pharmacy intravenous admixture by different methods of drug preparation

作　　者：朱刚[1] 张莉[1] 苏敏谊[1] 潘文松[1] 梁桂珍[1] 梁婉萍[1] 李玉珍[1] 赵天骄[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省佛山市第一人民医院,528000

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志（下旬版）》2005年第12期1-3,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：广东省佛山市卫生科技计划立项课题(项目编号:2004121)

摘　　要：目的探讨不同的备药方法,对静脉输液配置室内空气微粒的影响。方法分别使用4种不同的备药方法,进行模拟配液加药,在配液过程中使用空气粒子计数器对配置室内空气微粒数进行检测,以了解配液操作时空气微粒的污染情况。结果A、B组与C、D组的备药方法对配置室内配液操作时空气微粒数的影响差异有显著性(P<0.001)。结论A、B组备药方法对配置室内空气微粒污染明显,操作时释放微粒多,提示此备药方法不可取,C、D组备药方法对配置室内空气微粒数影响小,适合静脉输液配置的备药,尤其是D组可实现快速备药,提高工作效率,值得推广使用。Objective To explore the influence to the air particle in the pharmacy intravenous admixture by different methods of drug preparation. Methods To simulate the process of blending fluid and adding drugs by 4 different methods of preparing drugs. In this process, we can know the pollution of the air particle in blending rooms by checking the number of air particle with an air particle calculator. Results The methods of group A and B and that of group C and D differ obviously in affecting the number of air particle in the operation of blending, which has statistic significance （ P 〈 0.001）. Condusions The operation of preparing drugs by methods of group A and B releases more particle to the air than that of group C and D. They pollute the air obviously, which is warned not to use it. The preparing methods of group C and D adapt to pharmacy intravenous admixture. Especially Group D brings about fast preparing drugs and raises working efficiency. It is worth popularizing.

关 键 词：静脉输液配置 洁净空气 微粒 

分 类 号：R122.1[医药卫生—环境卫生学] R452[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]