检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭丽君[1]
出 处:《基层医学论坛》2005年第11期1006-1007,共2页The Medical Forum
摘 要:目的在婴幼儿采集血标本中观察两种不同留置针滴血法的差异。方法将1504例婴幼儿随机分成两组,实验组和对照组各752例,用两种不同留置针留取血标本。结果两组方法成功率比较,经χ2检验,P<0.001,有极显著性差异。结论贝朗公司生产的留置针滴血法是一种值得推广应用的好方法。Objective To observe the difference of two different dripping-blood methods of retaining needle in collecting infants' blood samples. Methods 1 504 cases involving in the study were randomly divided into two equal groups : the experiment group and the control group. Each group collected 752 infants' blood samplesoResults There was significant difference statistically between the success rate of two groups (P〈0.001).Conclusion the dripping-blood method of retaining needle which made by B. Braun Company is good and worth popularization o
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117