临床与保健和健康教育相结合的高危儿早期干预模式及效果分析  

Analysis on early intervention of combination of clinical cure,health care,and health education on high risk infants

作　　者：刘晶红[1] 曾淑萍[1] 赵慧贞[1] 周翔[1] 曾辉剑[1] 张小敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省珠海市妇幼保健院保健部,519000

出　　处：《中国妇幼保健》2005年第24期3220-3222,共3页Maternal and Child Health Care of China

摘　　要：目的:探讨高危儿早期干预模式,并进行疗效分析。方法:以我院出生的高危儿作为研究对象,分为干预组和未干预组,并以同期出生的正常新生儿作为对照组,干预组采用临床、保健和健康教育相结合的高危儿早期干预模式,3组小儿定期随访,并于1岁时采用婴儿智能发育量表(CDCC)作评估。结果:干预组患儿在1岁时,其智力发育指数(MDI)、运动发育指数(PDI)均较未干预组为高,两组相比,差异具有显著性意义(P<0.01),可达对照组水平(P>0.05)。干预组的后遗症发生率为5.6%(3/53),而未干预组的后遗症发生率为23.5%(8/34),两组在预后方面差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床、保健和健康教育相结合的早期干预模式具有非常好的康复效果,值得推广。Objective： To explore the working mode of early intervention of high risk infants, and to analyze the effects of the early intervention. Methods： High risk infants from Zhuhai Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital were randomly selected as intervention group and non - intervention group. Normal infants with similar age were selected as control group. Clinic cure, health care and health education were combined into the early intervention. All infants in 3 groups were followed up periodly and were tested by CDCC when they were 1 year old. Results ： The MDI and PDI of intervention group were significantly higher than those of non - intervention group （ P 〈 0. 01 ） . The rate of sequela of intervention group （ 5.6% ） was significantly lower than that （ 3.6% ） of the non - intervention group （ P 〈 0. 05 ） . Conclusion ： The mode of early intervention of combination of clinic cure, health care and health education is proved to be effective, and it deserves being spread widely.

关 键 词：高危儿 早期干预 康复效果 临床保健 健康教育 

分 类 号：R174[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]