检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属厦门市第一医院急诊科,361003
出 处:《福建医药杂志》2005年第6期19-21,共3页Fujian Medical Journal
摘 要:目的了解双氯芬酸钠栓剂对结石性肾绞痛的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我院急诊科近5年收治的236例急性肾绞痛病人资料,所有病例分为对照组和双氯芬酸钠栓剂组,分别观察治疗后2小时、8小时、24小时后的治疗效果,并比较两组使用杜冷丁的例数差异。结果治疗后2小时、8小时,双氯芬酸钠栓剂组与对照组比较,有显著性差异(P<0.05);治疗后24小时,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。两组使用杜冷丁的例数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论双氯芬酸钠栓剂可应用于急性肾绞痛的治疗,效果优于常规治疗,且减少了杜冷丁的使用。Objective To study the therapeutic efficacy of diclofenac sodium suppositories in renal colic caused by calculus. Methods To analyze 236 cases of acute renal colic in emergency department of our hospital. All cases were divided into control group (conventional therapy) and diclofenac sodium group. The efficacy of two groups was studied after being treated two hours, eight hours, 24 hours, respectively. Cases of two groups which were treated by pethidine were compared with at the same time. Results There was statistics difference in efficacy when diclofenac sodium groups was compared with control group after being treated two hours, eight hours, respectively (P〈0. 05) . There was no statistics difference in efficacy of two groups after being treated 24 hours (P〉0. 05) . There was statistics difference in two groups in cases which were treated by pethidine. Conclusion Diclofenac sodium suppositories can be used in treatment of acute renal colic and the efficacy is better than that of conventional therapy and the using of pethidine can be limited also.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175