检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘中民[1]
出 处:《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2005年第6期55-60,共6页Foreign Affairs Review
基 金:2004年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"世界海洋政治的发展与中国海洋战略选择"(04JJDZH017);2003年教育部重大攻关项目"中国海洋发展战略研究"(03JZD0024);2004年山东省社科规划项目"21世纪中国海洋政治战略研究"(04BMZ01)
摘 要:中美国内对海权问题与中美关系的认知都存在着两种相对立的观点,在美国表现为中国海权的发展是否会导致中美矛盾的加剧乃至冲突并威胁美国的东亚安全,美国是否需要对中国加以阻遏;在中国表现为中国应该选择对美国的海洋霸权进行挑战还是承认现状并规避与美国的冲突。中国在处理中美关系中的海权问题时,力求规避与美国的海权冲突;进一步加强中美海上军事安全磋商机制,增加相互之间的了解和在安全上的相互信任;谨慎有序地推动海上力量的发展。In recent years there have been two opposite views on Sea-power issues and the perception toward Sino- U. S relations. On the American side, this divergence suggests that the development of Chinese Sea-power would lead to mounting confrontations and even conflicts between China and America and threaten the American East Asian Security Strategy, and asks whether America should contain the development of Chinese Sea-power. On the Chinese side, it questions whether there are significant Sea-power contradictions and conflicts between China and America, and whether China should challenge American Sea hegemony or recognize the status quo and avoid conflicts with America. When dealing with Sea-power issues of Sino- U. S. relations, China should clearly recognize the Sea-power problems of Sino- U. S. relations from multiple needs and demands of the Chinese national macro strategy, and should avoid conflicts with U.S. Sea-power, and further strengthen maritime military security consultative mechanisms between China and the U.S., enhance mutual understanding and mutual trust concerning se- curity, avoid and reduce conflicts, carefully and orderly pursue the development of sea-power forces including both navy and air forces so as to realize peace through maintaining strength.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120